![]() ![]() Some verbs are irregular in BrE but regular in AmE. First of all, there is a difference between British and American English. Like any other modern language, English is constantly changing and transforming. And either I was unworthy of them, or they perhaps were not worthy of me. et aut ego indigna fui illis aut illi mihi forsitan digni non fuerunt quia forsitan viro alio conservasti me. bad argument 1 to 'lc' (string expected, got nil) 4th century, St Jerome, Vulgate, Tobit 3:19. Why do some irregular verbs have more than one past form? Should we learn both? first-person singular perfect active indicative of sum. And misunderstand has the same forms as understand: misunderstand - misunderstood - misunderstood. For example, overhear is the same as hear: overhear - overheard - overheard. ![]() We left out rarely used words you will hardly hear today like shoe - shod - shod.īesides, if we add a-, be-, for-, in-, inter-, mis-, off-, out-, over-, pre-, re-, un-, under-, up-, with- to the infinitive of an irregular verb, its past forms will stay the same. ![]() Are these really all existing irregular verbs? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |